Practice quiz

ABG interpretation practice with answers

Work through 20 fictional arterial blood gas cases, from the basic patterns to mixed disorders. Choose an interpretation, check the expected response and compare your reasoning with the worked answer.

By Reviewed 24 October 2026 20 cases, 40 scored questions For students, nurses, paramedics and doctors

Educational scope: Fictional arterial gases for learning interpretation; not a diagnostic tool. Free, with no account or email needed.

Written by , emergency physician (MBChB, FEBEM). Clinical content reviewed by the author on 24 October 2026; review covered the case histories, answers, explanations, calculations, image interpretation, annotation guides and teaching diagrams. This is author review, not an independent second review. All patients and orders are fictional. Content version 2026-10-24-1. Spotted an error? Report a correction and name the case ID.

Start ABG practice

Choose a set, then work one case at a time. Each case has two scored questions: the interpretation, then the check that supports it. Bicarbonate is shown as the calculated value, and every sample is arterial.

Pressure units

kPa = mmHg ÷ 7.50062. Switching changes the display only; answers are checked against the original mmHg values.

The interactive practice needs JavaScript. Every case, answer and explanation is also written out in the worked answers below.

How do you interpret an ABG step by step?

  1. First confirm the sample and units. Check pH, identify the process that explains its direction, and compare the other values with the response expected for that process. Interpret oxygenation separately using the clinical setting and oxygen delivery information.
  2. Teaching reference ranges are pH 7.35–7.45, PaCO2 35–45 mmHg and bicarbonate about 22–26 mmol/L. Reference intervals vary by laboratory. The equations use reference PaCO2 40 and bicarbonate 24. Compensation rules are approximate; history and time course matter.
  3. For metabolic acidosis, expected PaCO2 = 1.5 × bicarbonate + 8 ± 2 mmHg. A measured value above that range suggests an additional respiratory acidosis; one below suggests an additional respiratory alkalosis.
  4. For metabolic alkalosis, this module uses an approximate CO2 rise of 0.6–0.75 mmHg for each 1 mmol/L bicarbonate rise above 24. For respiratory disorders, distinguish acute from chronic responses using the history and the source table linked below.
  5. Anion gap here excludes potassium: sodium − (chloride + bicarbonate). Use the laboratory’s reference and consider albumin. A normal pH can coexist with important opposing disturbances. Do not use a single score or formula as a clinical decision on its own.
Five-step ABG method: check the data, read the pH, find the primary process, compare the expected response, then look at the anion gap and oxygenation separately.
The five-step order used in every worked answer.

Common ABG interpretation mistakes

  • Reading the PaO2 without the FiO2. A PaO2 of 100 mmHg is unremarkable on room air and a serious gas-exchange problem on an FiO2 of 0.6. Interpret oxygenation against the oxygen being delivered.
  • Calling a normal pH “fully compensated”. Compensation rarely returns the pH all the way to normal. A normal pH with an abnormal PaCO2 and an abnormal bicarbonate should make you look for two opposing processes (case 16 shows this).
  • Skipping the expected-response check. Without the expected PaCO2 or bicarbonate for the primary process, a second disorder is easy to miss.
  • Forgetting albumin in the anion gap. Low albumin lowers the measured gap, so a raised-gap acidosis can hide behind a “normal” number. A common approximation adds about 2.5 mmol/L to the gap for every 1 g/dL that albumin falls below 4 g/dL (case 15).
  • Treating the gas, not the patient. The same numbers mean different things in a fit adult, a patient with chronic CO2 retention and a patient who is tiring. The history and the trend decide what the result means.

Worked ABG cases with answers

Every case in full, with the correct answers and the reasoning. Open one when you have committed to your own answer.

Beginner: cases 1–6

Case 1 A reference gas Beginner

An adult is comfortable at rest at sea level. This is a reference exercise, not a test excluding all disease.

Arterial sample
pH7.40
PaCO240 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)24 mmol/L
PaO295 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: No acid base disturbance is apparent

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: The acid base values are in the teaching reference ranges; this does not exclude illness

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.40 lies within the teaching range 7.35–7.45.
  2. PaCO2 40 mmHg and bicarbonate 24 mmol/L are close to the reference values used in this module.
  3. There is no abnormal primary process for which to calculate compensation. PaO2 95 on room air is not concerning in this fictional context.

Common mistake: A reference gas is not a rule out test for a serious diagnosis.

Link to worked Case 1

Case 2 Ketones and fast breathing Beginner

An adult with known diabetes has vomiting, dehydration and a raised blood ketone measurement.

Arterial sample
pH7.29
PaCO226 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)12 mmol/L
PaO298 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)
Sodium140 mmol/L
Chloride102 mmol/L
Albumin4 g/dL

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: High anion gap metabolic acidosis with expected respiratory compensation

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: Winter’s expected PaCO2 is 26 plus or minus 2 mmHg

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.29 is acidemic and bicarbonate 12 is low.
  2. Anion gap = 140 − (102 + 12) = 26 mmol/L, above this exercise’s reference 8–12.
  3. Winter’s formula = 1.5 × 12 + 8 = 26 ± 2 mmHg. Measured PaCO2 26 fits.
  4. The gas supports the acid base pattern; the diagnosis and treatment require clinical and metabolic assessment.

Common mistake: Low PaCO2 can be appropriate compensation, rather than a separate primary disorder.

Link to worked Case 2

Case 3 Losses from the gut Beginner

An adult has several days of profuse diarrhoea. Albumin is normal.

Arterial sample
pH7.32
PaCO232 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)16 mmol/L
PaO296 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)
Sodium138 mmol/L
Chloride110 mmol/L
Albumin4 g/dL

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Normal anion gap metabolic acidosis with expected respiratory compensation

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: Anion gap is 12 and expected PaCO2 is 32 plus or minus 2 mmHg

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.32 and bicarbonate 16 identify metabolic acidosis.
  2. Anion gap = 138 − (110 + 16) = 12 mmol/L.
  3. Expected PaCO2 = 1.5 × 16 + 8 = 32 ± 2. Measured 32 fits.
  4. The context is compatible with gastrointestinal bicarbonate loss.

Common mistake: Normal gap and normal acid base balance mean different things.

Link to worked Case 3

Case 4 Persistent vomiting Beginner

An adult has persistent vomiting. The scenario concerns the gas pattern, not an instruction to replace a particular fluid or electrolyte.

Arterial sample
pH7.50
PaCO248 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)36 mmol/L
PaO292 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Metabolic alkalosis with a compatible respiratory response

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: A PaCO2 around 47–49 mmHg is compatible with the raised bicarbonate

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.50 is alkalemic; bicarbonate 36 is raised.
  2. Bicarbonate has risen 12 above the reference 24.
  3. A PaCO2 rise of approximately 0.6–0.75 × 12 gives 47.2–49 mmHg. Measured 48 is compatible.
  4. These are approximate teaching rules, not exact physiologic boundaries.

Common mistake: Judge PaCO2 in relation to the primary metabolic change.

Link to worked Case 4

Case 5 Reduced ventilation after sedation Beginner

Soon after sedation, an adult becomes drowsy and breathes slowly. The gas was obtained while help and airway support were being arranged.

Arterial sample
pH7.26
PaCO260 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)26 mmol/L
PaO261 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Acute respiratory acidosis with hypoxaemia

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: An acute bicarbonate rise of roughly 2–4 mmol/L is expected for this CO2 rise

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.26 is acidemic and PaCO2 60 is raised.
  2. The short time course supports an acute ventilatory problem.
  3. For a 20 mmHg CO2 rise, an acute bicarbonate response of about 2–4 mmol/L is plausible; measured 26 fits the lower end.
  4. PaO2 61 on air is low. The bedside breathing problem needs immediate assessment, not just a label.

Common mistake: Do not delay assessment of ventilation while completing a calculation.

Link to worked Case 5

Case 6 Sudden rapid breathing Beginner

An adult has sudden tachypnoea and chest discomfort. The cause has not yet been established.

Arterial sample
pH7.62
PaCO220 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)20 mmol/L
PaO2100 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Acute respiratory alkalosis

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: A small acute bicarbonate fall is compatible; the cause of hyperventilation remains unresolved

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.62 is alkalemic and PaCO2 20 is low.
  2. The CO2 has fallen 20 mmHg below 40.
  3. An acute bicarbonate decrease of about 2–4 mmol/L is compatible; measured bicarbonate 20 fits.
  4. Pain, hypoxaemia, pulmonary vascular disease and other causes need clinical consideration; do not infer anxiety from the gas alone.

Common mistake: A physiologic pattern is not a diagnosis of its cause.

Link to worked Case 6

Intermediate: cases 7–13

Case 7 A documented chronic baseline Intermediate

A stable adult with chronic hypercapnic lung disease has prior similar gases over several weeks.

Arterial sample
pH7.35
PaCO260 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)32 mmol/L
PaO262 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Chronic respiratory acidosis with an expected bicarbonate response

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: For a 20 mmHg CO2 rise, bicarbonate around 30–32 mmol/L is expected chronically

Worked answer

  1. PaCO2 60 is raised and the documented time course is chronic.
  2. A chronic rise of approximately 3–4 mmol/L per 10 mmHg gives bicarbonate 30–32.
  3. Measured bicarbonate 32 is compatible; pH rounds to 7.35 and must not be called normal solely from that rounding.
  4. PaO2 62 is low on air and still needs interpretation in the clinical context.

Common mistake: Use the prior gas and time course; one sample does not establish chronicity.

Link to worked Case 7

Case 8 A sustained low CO2 Intermediate

An adult has a documented sustained hyperventilatory state over several days. No sudden change is described.

Arterial sample
pH7.42
PaCO230 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)19 mmol/L
PaO294 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Chronic respiratory alkalosis with a compatible bicarbonate response

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: A chronic bicarbonate fall to about 19–20 mmol/L fits a 10 mmHg CO2 fall

Worked answer

  1. PaCO2 30 is low. The history supplies the sustained time course.
  2. The chronic bicarbonate response is approximately a fall of 4–5 mmol/L per 10 mmHg CO2 reduction.
  3. Bicarbonate 19 and pH 7.42 are compatible. The clinical cause still needs assessment.

Common mistake: A pH within the reference interval can coexist with a compensated disorder.

Link to worked Case 8

Case 9 The expected breathing response is missing Intermediate

An adult with ketoacidosis becomes exhausted and less responsive.

Arterial sample
pH7.02
PaCO240 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)10 mmol/L
PaO270 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Metabolic acidosis with additional respiratory acidosis

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: Expected PaCO2 is 23 plus or minus 2; measured 40 is inappropriately high

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.02 indicates marked acidemia.
  2. Bicarbonate 10 identifies metabolic acidosis.
  3. Winter’s expected PaCO2 = 1.5 × 10 + 8 = 23 ± 2 mmHg.
  4. Measured 40 is well above that range, indicating an added respiratory acidosis in this context. The deterioration requires urgent senior assessment.

Common mistake: Normal range CO2 can be dangerous when a low CO2 is needed for compensation.

Link to worked Case 9

Case 10 An alkalemic patient with a metabolic acidosis Intermediate

An adult with infection and circulatory compromise is breathing rapidly. Lactate is raised.

Arterial sample
pH7.47
PaCO220 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)14 mmol/L
PaO285 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)
Sodium140 mmol/L
Chloride102 mmol/L
Albumin4 g/dL

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Metabolic acidosis with additional respiratory alkalosis

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: Expected PaCO2 is 29 plus or minus 2; measured 20 is lower than expected

Worked answer

  1. Bicarbonate 14 is low despite the alkalemic pH of 7.47.
  2. Expected PaCO2 = 1.5 × 14 + 8 = 29 ± 2.
  3. Measured 20 is lower than expected, supporting an additional respiratory alkalosis.
  4. Anion gap = 140 − (102 + 14) = 24 mmol/L.

Common mistake: Name all supported processes rather than letting the direction of pH hide one.

Link to worked Case 10

Case 11 Acidosis with renal impairment Intermediate

An adult with substantial renal impairment has nausea and tachypnoea. Albumin is normal.

Arterial sample
pH7.29
PaCO226 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)12 mmol/L
PaO293 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)
Sodium142 mmol/L
Chloride104 mmol/L
Albumin4 g/dL

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: High anion gap metabolic acidosis with expected respiratory compensation

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: Anion gap is 26 and PaCO2 26 matches Winter’s expected value

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.29 and low bicarbonate indicate metabolic acidosis.
  2. Anion gap = 142 − (104 + 12) = 26.
  3. Expected PaCO2 is 26 ± 2; measured 26 fits.
  4. The case is consistent with the context but a raised gap still requires clinical evaluation for its contributors.

Common mistake: A plausible context does not exclude other contributors to a raised anion gap.

Link to worked Case 11

Case 12 Acute deterioration from a chronic baseline Intermediate

A prior stable gas was PaCO2 60 and bicarbonate 32. Over the last hour the patient has become drowsier. Current oxygen is a controlled FiO2 of 0.28.

Arterial sample
pH7.25
PaCO280 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)34 mmol/L
PaO258 mmHg
FiO20.28

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Acute on chronic respiratory acidosis

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: The prior baseline and acute CO2 increase explain the modest further bicarbonate rise

Worked answer

  1. The baseline already documented chronic hypercapnia.
  2. PaCO2 has acutely risen another 20 mmHg, while bicarbonate rose from 32 to 34.
  3. An acute buffering response on top of a chronic baseline fits pH 7.25.
  4. PaO2 is low despite supplemental oxygen. Interpret the whole clinical deterioration urgently.

Common mistake: Do not apply an isolated chronic equation while ignoring the known baseline.

Link to worked Case 12

Case 13 More bicarbonate than compensation predicts Intermediate

An adult with chronic hypercapnia has several days of vomiting and recent diuretic exposure.

Arterial sample
pH7.50
PaCO260 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)45 mmol/L
PaO265 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Respiratory acidosis with additional metabolic alkalosis

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: Expected chronic bicarbonate is about 30–32, well below the measured 45

Worked answer

  1. PaCO2 60 is raised, but pH 7.50 is alkalemic.
  2. Chronic compensation for CO2 60 would give bicarbonate about 30–32.
  3. Bicarbonate 45 exceeds that response and supports additional metabolic alkalosis.

Common mistake: Compensation does not usually overshoot to reverse the direction of pH.

Link to worked Case 13

Advanced: cases 14–20

Case 14 Two processes with a nearly normal pH Advanced

An adult has vomiting and a concurrent hypoventilatory illness.

Arterial sample
pH7.37
PaCO265 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)36 mmol/L
PaO255 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Metabolic alkalosis with additional respiratory acidosis

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: PaCO2 65 is substantially above the roughly 47–49 expected for bicarbonate 36

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.37 is within the reference interval, but both PaCO2 and bicarbonate are abnormal.
  2. For bicarbonate 36, a compensatory PaCO2 around 47–49 is expected by the chosen teaching rule.
  3. Measured PaCO2 65 indicates an additional respiratory acidosis. PaO2 is also low.

Common mistake: A near normal pH can be the net result of opposing primary disturbances.

Link to worked Case 14

Case 15 A gap hidden by low albumin Advanced

An adult with poor nutrition and acute illness has albumin 2 g/dL. The lab’s teaching anion gap reference is 8–12 without potassium.

Arterial sample
pH7.33
PaCO235 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)18 mmol/L
PaO290 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)
Sodium138 mmol/L
Chloride108 mmol/L
Albumin2 g/dL

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: Metabolic acidosis with an elevated albumin adjusted anion gap

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: Measured gap 12 becomes about 17 after albumin adjustment

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.33 and bicarbonate 18 indicate metabolic acidosis.
  2. Unadjusted gap = 138 − (108 + 18) = 12.
  3. Albumin adjusted gap ≈ 12 + 2.5 × (4 − 2) = 17 mmol/L. This is an approximation, interpreted against the local method.
  4. Winter’s expected PaCO2 = 35 ± 2; measured 35 fits.

Common mistake: Use g/dL in this correction; albumin 20 g/L equals 2 g/dL.

Link to worked Case 15

Case 16 The normal pH trap Advanced

An adult has tinnitus, vomiting and possible salicylate exposure. Toxicology assessment is underway.

Arterial sample
pH7.40
PaCO220 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)12 mmol/L
PaO298 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)
Sodium140 mmol/L
Chloride104 mmol/L
Albumin4 g/dL

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: High anion gap metabolic acidosis with respiratory alkalosis

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: Expected PaCO2 is 26 plus or minus 2; measured 20 supports an additional respiratory alkalosis

Worked answer

  1. pH is 7.40, but bicarbonate and CO2 are both very low.
  2. Anion gap = 140 − (104 + 12) = 24.
  3. Winter’s expected PaCO2 is 26 ± 2; 20 is too low for compensation alone.
  4. The mixed pattern fits the fictional exposure history but does not establish a toxin concentration or treatment plan.

Common mistake: Normal pH is not the same as a normal gas.

Link to worked Case 16

Case 17 Two metabolic acid sources Advanced

An adult has ketosis and substantial diarrhoea. Assume baseline bicarbonate 24 and baseline anion gap 12 for this exercise.

Arterial sample
pH7.29
PaCO226 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)12 mmol/L
PaO297 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)
Sodium140 mmol/L
Chloride108 mmol/L
Albumin4 g/dL

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: High gap metabolic acidosis with evidence suggesting an additional normal gap metabolic acidosis

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: Gap rise is 8 while bicarbonate fall is 12; the clinical context supports an additional normal gap process

Worked answer

  1. Gap = 140 − (108 + 12) = 20.
  2. Gap rise = 20 − 12 = 8; bicarbonate fall = 24 − 12 = 12.
  3. The rise is smaller than the bicarbonate fall; with diarrhoea this suggests another normal gap acidosis. Delta comparisons are approximate and baseline dependent.
  4. Expected PaCO2 = 26 ± 2, matching the measured 26.

Common mistake: Use delta comparisons as supporting evidence, not rigid diagnostic cutoffs.

Link to worked Case 17

Case 18 Normal gas numbers with an abnormal gap Advanced

An adult has prolonged vomiting plus independently documented ketonaemia. Assume baseline bicarbonate 24, gap 12 and normal albumin.

Arterial sample
pH7.40
PaCO240 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)24 mmol/L
PaO296 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)
Sodium140 mmol/L
Chloride86 mmol/L
Albumin4 g/dL

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: High gap metabolic acidosis masked by a concurrent metabolic alkalosis

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: The gap is 30; a raised gap with unchanged bicarbonate supports opposing metabolic processes in this context

Worked answer

  1. pH 7.40, bicarbonate 24 and PaCO2 40 look normal in isolation.
  2. Gap = 140 − (86 + 24) = 30.
  3. With the stated baseline and ketonaemia, the high gap plus preserved bicarbonate supports concurrent metabolic alkalosis from the history.
  4. Do not apply Winter’s formula mechanically to this net normal bicarbonate to diagnose an additional respiratory disorder.

Common mistake: Interpret electrolytes and clinical context even when pH looks normal.

Link to worked Case 18

Case 19 Oxygenation is a separate question Advanced

An adult receives a measured FiO2 of 0.50 through a controlled system. The gas is arterial. Imaging, PEEP and timing are not supplied.

Arterial sample
pH7.40
PaCO240 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)24 mmol/L
PaO255 mmHg
FiO20.5

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: No acid base disturbance apparent, but substantial oxygenation impairment

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: PaO2 divided by FiO2 is 110 mmHg; this ratio alone does not establish ARDS

Worked answer

  1. pH, PaCO2 and bicarbonate are at their teaching reference values.
  2. PaO2 55 despite FiO2 0.50 is abnormal.
  3. P/F ratio = 55 ÷ 0.50 = 110 mmHg.
  4. ARDS classification requires additional clinical, imaging and respiratory support criteria; these are not supplied.

Common mistake: Enter FiO2 as a fraction, and do not equate an oxygenation ratio with a complete diagnosis.

Link to worked Case 19

Case 20 Check the numbers before naming the disorder Advanced · transcription check

A copied worksheet reports arterial pH 7.40, PaCO2 60 and bicarbonate 24. You are asked to validate the transcription before interpreting it.

Arterial sample
pH7.40
PaCO260 mmHg
HCO3 (calculated)24 mmol/L
PaO290 mmHg
FiO20.21 (room air)

Question 1: Which interpretation best fits the data and history?

Answer: The three acid base values are internally inconsistent and need verification

Question 2: Which statement best checks your interpretation?

Answer: The Henderson Hasselbalch check predicts pH about 7.22, not the reported 7.40

Worked answer

  1. Check pH ≈ 6.1 + log10[24 ÷ (0.03 × 60)] ≈ 7.22.
  2. The reported 7.40 is incompatible with the other two values beyond rounding.
  3. Verify the original report, units, sample identity and whether bicarbonate came from a separate sample. Obtain clinical review or repeat sampling when indicated.
  4. This case intentionally contains a transcription error. Do not silently fix a real report.

Common mistake: An elegant interpretation is useless if the source data are wrong.

Intentional transcription exercise. The values in this case are deliberately inconsistent. It tests whether you check the numbers before interpreting them; the question bank does not correct them.

Link to worked Case 20

Questions about this practice

Is this an ABG quiz with answers?

Yes. Each case includes two questions, the correct answers, visible calculations where relevant and a common interpretation error.

Can I use kPa?

Yes. Use the pressure units switch above the cases. It changes pressure display units while preserving the original calculation values.

Does a normal pH mean the blood gas is normal?

No. Several advanced cases show how compensation or opposing disturbances can bring the pH into the reference interval.

Educational disclaimer

Educational use only. These arterial blood gas cases are fictional teaching exercises. Oxygenation is interpreted separately from acid–base status, and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio alone does not diagnose ARDS. Educational fictional practice only. Not patient-specific advice or an assessment of clinical competence. Scores are informal feedback on one practice attempt; no pass mark, certificate or competence decision is made from them. Follow your supervision, scope of practice and local protocols.

Sources and further reading

  1. Merck Manual Professional — Primary changes and compensations in simple acid base disorders
  2. University of Colorado — Evaluation of acid base disorders teaching handout

Reference ranges, formulae and pathways vary between laboratories, services and countries. Use your own local guidance in practice.